Acesso via Blog do ISAPE
Terra Notícias
17 de janeiro de 2011
Dilma revê ofertas e recomeça processo de escolha de caças
A presidente Dilma Rousseff decidiu adiar a escolha do fornecedor de jatos de combate da Força Aérea e vai reavaliar todas as ofertas finalistas para buscar novas garantias e acertar questões sensíveis, como transferência de tecnologia.
A decisão marca uma reviravolta no processo, uma vez que o antecessor de Dilma, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, repetidamente expressou preferência pela oferta da francesa Dassault e seus jatos Rafale. Mas Lula deixou o governo sem tomar uma decisão, deixando-a a cargo de Dilma.
A presidente decidiu reiniciar o processo de avaliação das aeronaves e, a esta altura, não tem preferência por qualquer fornecedor, disse uma fonte do governo. Os outros finalistas da licitação, avaliada em pelo menos US$ 4 bilhões, são o caça Gripen NG, da sueca Saab, e o F18 Super Hornet, da norte-americana Boeing.
Na semana passada, Dilma teria pedido pessoalmente a senadores norte-americanos por garantias adicionais do Congresso dos Estados Unidos para transferência de tecnologia na proposta da Boeing.
http://noticias.terra.com.br/brasil/noticias/0,,OI4894050-EI7896,00-Dilma+reve+ofertas+e+recomeca+processo+de+escolha+de+cacas.html
______________________________________________________
Dassault Rafale - apontado como favorito pelo Presidente Lula, chegou a ser considerado vencedor da concorrência para o FX-2. |
______________________________________________________
Reuters
Mon Jan 17, 2011
Exclusive: Rousseff “starting over” in Brazil jets tender
By Brian WinterBRASILIA (Reuters) – New Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has decided to delay awarding a multi-billion dollar Air Force jet contract and reevaluate the finalists’ bids, in a move that could signal a realignment of Brazil’s strategic and defense alliances, sources with knowledge of the decision told Reuters.
The surprise decision is a blow to France’s Dassault, which as recently as last month looked like a lock to quickly win the deal, and puts its U.S.-based rival Boeing back in with a chance.
Rousseff’s predecessor, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, had while in office repeatedly expressed his preference for Dassault’s bid to build at least 36 Rafale jets at a cost of more than $4 billion as part of a long-running effort to modernize the Brazilian Air Force fleet.
The other finalists for the contract were the Gripen NG, produced by Sweden’s Saab, and Boeing’s F-18.
Lula left office on January 1 without resolving the issue, although many observers believed the final decision in favor of Dassault was a mere formality since Rousseff was Lula’s chief of staff and she has retained many of his Cabinet members, including the defense minister.
Instead, Rousseff has opted to “start over” in her evaluation process with no clear preference for any of the finalists, a senior government source said.
“This is her decision now … and she wants to look carefully at the details,” the source said on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the talks.
In a sign that Boeing is still in the running, Rousseff personally asked U.S. senators visiting Brasilia last week for additional technology transfer guarantees from the U.S. Congress to bolster the Boeing bid, sources with knowledge of the conversation said.
The deal is the centerpiece of Brazil’s efforts to bolster its defense capabilities at a time when its clout in global affairs is growing in tandem with its economy. The government is also demanding generous transfers of proprietary technology, hoping to bolster its own growing defense industry.
Each of the offers has strengths and weaknesses. Dassault’s bid offers good technology transfers but carries a high price tag, officials have said.
Saab’s bid could be held back by the perception that Sweden offers a less prestigious strategic relationship than France or the United States. Meanwhile, there are doubts about technology transfers within the Boeing bid.
Political considerations have also weighed. Brazil’s relationship with the United States deteriorated in the final years of Lula’s presidency, but Rousseff has shown clear signs of wanting to improve bilateral ties. Meanwhile, Lula had strong ties with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and signed a strategic defense agreement with France.
Last Monday, Rousseff asked U.S. Senator John McCain — the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which has jurisdiction over aeronautical issues — and fellow Republican Senator John Barrasso if the U.S. Congress would be able to provide an additional, formal guarantee of technology transfers in the Boeing bid.
“It’s relevant that she was the one who raised the subject,” one of the sources said, also speaking on condition of anonymity.
McCain told reporters following his meeting with Rousseff that “there is concern about technology transfer.”
“I intend to go back (to Washington) and make sure that it is very clear — that both the president of the United States and the Congress of the United States make it clear — that there will be complete technology transfer if the government of Brazil decides to acquire the F-18,” McCain said at the time.
Boeing and U.S. officials including Defense Secretary Robert Gates have already provided guarantees regarding technology transfers, but Rousseff may be seeking more generous terms — or additional promises that could help ease misgivings among senior members of Brazil’s armed forces and defense ministry, many of whom have favored the French bid.
HUGE STAKES FOR COMPANIES, BRAZIL
It’s unclear how long Rousseff’s evaluation will take, the senior government source said. She could choose to review existing bids rather than demand a total do-over of the technical portion of the bids, which could take years.
A spokesperson for the president’s office declined comment on Sunday.
The delay will prolong a process that began nearly a decade ago under Lula’s predecessor, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, and has seen several ups and downs for the bidders.
The stakes only seem to grow over time. The contract will likely be worth much more than the initial bids, which have been reported by Brazilian media in the $4 billion to $6 billion range. Maintenance contracts will be lucrative, and Brazil could eventually buy more than 100 aircraft.
Boeing is willing to provide “any additional information” regarding its bid, company spokesperson Marcia Costley said in an e-mailed statement.
“We stand ready to discuss our proposal with the new administration, who will be responsible for the success or failure of this high-visibility acquisition and deserves to understand how it will be managed and implemented over the next decade,” Costley said.
Saab spokesman Erik Magni said the company was unaware of any changes to the bidding process but was encouraged by the recent change in administration.
“Hopefully (Rousseff) comes in with more of a clean slate — has another way of looking at it than the previous president. That can be positive for us,” Magni said.
A spokesperson for Dassault declined comment.
French defense sources told Reuters they had heard preliminary indications that there would be an overhaul of the bidding process under Rousseff.
The sale is especially critical for Dassault because it would be the first export order for the multi-role Rafale. The family-owned company’s defense exports have been under pressure for several years as it struggles to repeat the success of the previous generation of Mirage warplanes.
As recently as January 4, French Defense Minister Alain Juppe said negotiations were “on the right track” with Brazil.
One factor that may work in Boeing’s favor going forward is a shift in Brazil’s relationship with the United States.
Lula’s close relationship with Iran, and his unsuccessful attempt to mediate an international dispute over that country’s nuclear program resulted in a chill in ties between Brasilia and Washington that spilled over into trade. However, advisers say Rousseff is eager to improve relations with Washington, which she sees a potential commercial ally at a time of global financial uncertainty and growing strains with China over Beijing’s trade policies.
(Additional reporting by Raymond Colitt, Tim Hepher in Paris and Anna Ringstrom in Stockholm; Editing by Todd Benson and Kieran Murray)
http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCATRE70G0ZC20110117?sp=true
______________________________________________________
Acesso via Blog do ISAPE
Nós brasileiros nunca fomos tão próximos das nossas forças armadas, principalmente em decorrência da ditadura e seus atos insanos relacionados aos cidadãos comuns, mas, sempre fomos patriotas ao extremo e nos preocupamos com o andamento de tudo e principalmente todas as prerrogativas relacionadas à nossa soberania nacional. Antes não tínhamos o pré-sal, não éramos os principais produtores mundiais de alimentos, não tínhamos controle ou conhecimento de nosso subsolo, enfim, não tínhamos as riquezas que temos hoje. O Brasil de hoje é um país governável, auto-suficiente e com um potencial descomunal de crescimento futuro. Um horizonte paupável e visível ao resto do mundo. Quando se iniciou esse programa de reaparelhamento da FAB, nosso FX, pensamos em se tratar de algo mais racional e menos penoso, afinal, temos a EMBRAER uma das maiores empresas aeroespaciais da América Latina ou mesmo do mundo, temos o ITA, um das maiores referências em engenharia nesse setor, enfim, temos técnicos suficientes e com conhecimentos de causa para definir qualquer programa que se relacione a escolha de vetores e offset que possam trazer benefícios ao país. Tudo estava bem, embora bastante moroso, passou de FX a FX-2, a FX-3, a FX-4, até haver a escolha dos finalistas: SAAB Gripen NG, Boeing F/A-F-18 Super Hornet e por fim o Dassault Rafale F-3. Depois de tanto tempo uma escolha final que qualquer amador a qualificaria como grotesca. Todos esses três vetores apresentados são peças mundialmente descartáveis e obsoletas. São caças de 2ª e 3ª gerações, onde houve upgrade na tentativa de potenciá-los e torná-los com uma sobrevida maior. Hoje se busca equipar as forças aéreas com caças de 5ª geração e o Brasil encontra-se totalmente na contramão mundial. As assinaturas geradas nos radares pelas tecnologias stelth mudaram o horizonte aéreo definitivamente. A FAB não pode errar nessas circunstâncias, não pode ter em seus hangares vetores incompletos, que tragam dúvidas quanto a sua potencialidade de proteção ao país. O momento é crucial para se definir uma escala de prioridades que tragam tranqüilidade ao espaço aéreo brasileiro. Essa auto-suficiência aérea deverá ser totalmente inquestionável ao brasileiro e ao restante do mundo que o cerca. Para guardar mais latas velhas ou manter um museu a céu aberto é melhor estabelecer uma nova era ou um novo provedor, um museólogo específico e que não tenha nenhuma ligação com a FAB. O período dos turbofans ou motores a hélices, já se foi, estamos no século XXI, na era tecnológica, em um mundo globalizado, onde a informatização é real e onde tudo acontece com agilidade, não podemos brincar de aviõezinhos e sorrirmos como se desconhecêssemos o que se passa a nossa volta. Que sejamos realistas e menos ingênuos.
ResponderExcluirPARA O TAMANHO E A QUANTIDADE DE RIQUEZAS QUE O BRASIL TEM, OS CAÇAS F-5BR, OS F-CINQUINHOS QUE A FAB TEM ATUALMENTE SÃO FRAQUINHOS, MESMO COM OS AVIÔNICOS ATUALIZADOS; NÃO TEM VELOCIDADE E NEM RAIO DE COMBATE SUFICIENTES PARA FAZER A COBERTURA DO IMENSO TERRITÓRIO NACIONAL. O CAÇA ADEQUADO PARA O BRASIL TERIA QUE TER COMO REQUISITOS O LONGO RAIO DE COMBATE, O LONGO ALCANCE E A CAPACIDADE DE SUPERCRUZEIRO, ISTO É, A CAPACIDADE DE DESENVOLVER VELOCIDADES SUPERSÔNICAS SEM NECESSIDADE NENHUMA DE PÓS-COMBUSTÃO. O CAÇA MAIS ADEQUADO PARA A FAB É NO MÍNIMO DO MÍNIMO DO MÍNIMO O SUKHOI SU-35BM, QUE FAZ DAR MAIS MORAL PARA A FAB E ESTÁ MAIS ADEQUADO PARA A REALIDADE TERRITORIAL BRASILEIRA
ResponderExcluir